Food for thought

People come out with all kinds of outlandish “facts” about the incredible size of our Universe, but thanks to Carl Sagan, none of these statements are as common as this one: “There are more stars in the Universe than there are grains of sand on Earth.”

It seems impossible, doesn’t it? The Universe is huge, but when you consider how many beaches there are on this planet and how minuscule a grain of sand is, it makes you think that in this instance at least, Carl Sagan was maybe taking a bit of poetic license with his statement? Thankfully, Fraser Cain of ‘Universe Today’ has taken a stab at answering this question once and for all.

Cain starts with the estimate that on average, there are approximately 100 to 400 billion stars in a galaxy. There are estimated to be around 100 billion galaxies in our Universe, which means that there are approximately 10 sextillion (10 billion, billion) stars in our Universe. This is what 10 sextillion looks like written down: 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Of course this is just an estimate. There could actually be upwards of 200 sextillion stars in the Universe, there just really is no way of saying for sure. But for the purposes of this investigation, 10 sextillion is the magic number used by Mr. Cain, who now moves on to estimate the number of grains of sand on Earth’s beaches.

Around 8,000 grains of sand can be packed into one cubic centimetre, which means that 10 sextillion grains of sand placed in a ball would create a sphere with a radius of 10.6 kilometres. According to Fraser Cain, “The Math Dude”, there are approximately 700 trillion cubic metres of beach on our planet. These 700 trillion cubic metres could therefore hold approximately 5 sextillion grains of sand, which means that Carl Sagan was, of course, correct.

Cain admits that these are jut mathematical estimates and there is of course no way of confirming this notion with 100% certainty, but for now at least, if you want to wow your friends, feel free to use this fact safe in the knowledge that it is at least, probably correct.

As for the second half of the statement, visit for an answer.

Info thanks to author Kieran Dickson, posted in on November 26, 2013.

This entry was posted in Education, Fun, News, Things to Read. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s