Local government meetings to inform Sunshine Coast fixed link study

Beginning next week, the Government of British Columbia will be meeting with First Nations, local governments, chambers of commerce and other community leaders as part of initial consultations for the Sunshine Coast Fixed Link Feasibility Study. The meetings will be hosted by West Vancouver-Sea to Sky MLA Jordan Sturdy.

A number of potential connections between the Sunshine Coast and Lower Mainland are being explored, with concept options ranging from a highway link around Jervis Inlet, to direct bridge connections along the coast. The costs and benefits of each option will be assessed and will be compared with existing ferry services.

R.F. Binnie and Associates, a Vancouver-based civil engineering firm with expertise in consultation processes, is gathering and updating technical information on the options. In addition to the technical feasibility of a highway link, the input from these upcoming meetings will also be considered as government assesses the practicality of a potential future connection between the Sunshine Coast and Lower Mainland.

First Nations and local government representatives that have an interest in the feasibility of a Sunshine Coast highway link, such as West Vancouver and the North Shore, the Sea-to-Sky area, Howe Sound, the Sunshine Coast and Vancouver Island, have been invited to participate in meetings. These meetings will take place over the next several weeks.

The public will also have an opportunity to provide input into this feasibility study in fall 2016. R.F. Binnie’s final report to government on the Sunshine Coast Fixed Link Feasibility Study is expected in late 2016.

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Local government meetings to inform Sunshine Coast fixed link study

  1. Graeme Murray says:

    Once again, the majority of stakeholders, the general public, are not invited to take part in the meetings. They are just given the opportunity to have their input very late in the proceedings and probably only a week or two before the final report is due. Certainly not in time for the author to give any lengthly or serious consideration of the publics view which may or may not be reflected by the viewpoints of the pecial interest groups who will actually be at the table.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s